Aqa Food Anthology Essay

Comp atomic number 18 dickens textbooks from the Anthology, which present different views close what we should immerse.Text 9 is a newsprint word by toilette Torode on Why we should all extinguish red meat that vibrantly explores the issue of eating red meat and with a meat lover perspective fighting a passionate joust against the bad boy of British culture reputation meat has. John Torode is a well-known eminence chef and his picture endorses the obligate with a thought of knowledge and character smiling for the culmination of his love of beef. This bind is written to reach out to the general public, more than so to the health conscious and the skeptics to persuade and bring by to a new course of hazarding towards eating red meat and food in general. A genuinely comparable purpose is seen throughout text 11, the Vegetarian Society websites vii simple move to going- and staying- vegetarian which aim to guide prospective vegetarians to the ultimatum of you argo n vegetarian through the use of enabling and reassuring lexis.In text 11 the text is clearly set out into seven steps that ar incorporated to coincide, following an order to which a structured plan flows analogous a timeline- building up confidence and experience to the ref with the desired meat of easing them in to the committee of becoming vegetarians. This is almost like an direction manual and by the text being set in steps it is easy for the reader to digest. In comparison the structure of text 9 does not use bullet points but instead is presented in prose, which allows for tosh telltale(a). Even though the texts atomic number 18 structured differently they are twain still informative, instructive and possibly persuasive.Language techniques are chosen guardedly to create these types of texts. For in position, Torode uses narrative and inclusive dustup. Torode begins by using first individual pronouns When I first moved in his anecdote of his experiences with meat, this creates a face-to-face, informal effect almost as if he is revealing himself to you making him more likeable and warm up, and this is consistent throughout the text as he carries on telling us how hed been raised on the close up making him seem like a down to earth laugh at who the reader can connect with.Later on in the article Torode employs inclusive language Why? Because we eat too overmuch, in this example Torode excessively uses rhetoric possibly with the purpose of persuading as it makes the reader think and is a transition to his argument to why this is true. To end the article Torode slips back into the more ain first soulfulness narration much like the formalities of a conversation. T here(predicate)(predicate) is a change of direction in the text from the anecdotal and friendly spirit to where he gets secure and then back to very ad hominem and reassuring- this is all formed to be persuasive as the personal address is comforting and the serious facts are used to further persuade the reader.The cardinal Steps lack near of the fore mentioned techniques. What can be seen instead is a third person narrative throughout the article, thus making it last less personal but more instructive and informative. The writer uses a brisk picking of lexis making the sentences and whole body of text shorter than text 9. Even though this text is significantly shorter it still manages to come across as refer and helpful or borrow one from your local library, here its almost like a whisper as if the voice is matched to soul friendly doing you a favor.So even though text 11 is not as colloquial and expressive as text 9 it still uses language in a way that makes it seem roughly informal, neutral and relaxed for the effect of seeming reassuring and therefore persuasive. For example the personal caption under the picture of the woman also uses first person pronoun I gave up meat and even uses informal language such(prenominal) as veggie to seem r elatable and also down to earth- just like Torode is trying to sound. This is seen in both texts as a technique to warm to the reader and draw their interest.In text 9 we see a consistent use of expressive lexis which displays passion from the narrator as he tells us we ate platters of it and I loved it. He tells us about my love affair with beef using an array of adjectives (large, smoky, well stain join of beef) and alliteration (succulent steak) to entice the readers imagination and exclaim meat in support of his argument of Why we should all eat red meat. Combined with the use ofhyperballys and negative exaggeration (cholesterin overdose) when speaking of the opposing argument it radiates a consistent horse sense of passion backed up by authoritative facts. All in all creating a very impressive, persuasive argument.How the Vegetarian Societys Seven simple steps does try to persuade and guide the reader is instead different from the why we should all eat red meat article in t erms of language use. As it is a step-by-step guide it doesnt include a personal story or affectional language like in Torodes article. Instead it uses imperatives and suggestions, (try something new) in every step and modal verbs throughout in a simplistic manner. Perhaps because it doesnt need to be as persuasive since it is aimed at the already prospective vegetarian and therefore it is not opinionated or overly patronizing in any way. The effect of this is that a calm tone is created and each step simply guides the reader- the persuasion is much more subtle.Whilst language is chosen to include and instruct it is also chosen to discriminate against the encounter to eliminate possible doubts and reassure the reader, this is used in both texts. In Torodes article he declares, Uninformed customers still worry that here it mocks those who worry about BSE and what it might do. A superior stance is taken here in order to persuade. In text 11 it is strikingly similar as it tells the reader dont be put off by ill-informed scare stories from people who know very little about their own health. Both of these bias declaratives are used to- once again- effectively comfort and assure the reader.Although not so inclusively as text 9, text 11 uses celebrity endorsement in the form of a picture of Sir Paul McCartney a musician and vegetarian lodge patron almost like a figure signal that is encouragement for readers to think that it is more acceptable to follow the views of what we should eat according to them because these far-famed people do. The rhetorical question posed by Sir Paul apparently, captioned downstairs the picture is a touch to make the reader think, the words sound wise and are placed there to enliven such thoughts to the reader.This is also seen in text 9 towards the end of the article when Torode very personally tells us My family eatswhich he makes very personal even telling us his childrens names. Torode is using himself as a figure head to the views on what we should eat as after all he is this celebrity chef and if it is good enough for his family- it should be good for us?In shutdown the texts argue completely different views on what we should eat but the seek effect on the reader is very similar and this is why there are similarities in the way the texts both try to persuade. They are both different types of texts and therefore the language, tone and techniques vary- text 9 uses a more personal and complex approach in the form of a personal narrative to persuade the reader and create an impressive argument, whilst text 9 is a much more simplistic and subtle informative text.They are both consistently persuasive and lead to the final purpose- of leading, encouraging and communicate the reader through a set of steps or a structured narrative to a new view of what we as the reader should eat. Even though Text 9 is more opinionated both texts are still biased arguments with mainly the purpose of persuasion. I think both texts are very suited to their purpose and although look and are different they interestingly use language for a very similar purpose.