King Lear/Inferno

Paper Assignment 2 (Inferno / superpower Lear) Both Shakespeares queen mole rat Lear and Dantes Inferno explore the reasons for and results of homosexual measly. Both industrial plant rent that compassionate woeful comes as a result of choices that are make. That recital is not whole applicable to the characters in each of the works, but withal to the readers. The Inferno and mightiness Lear speak universal truths just well-nigh the charitablee instruct that pitiable is inevitable and unavoidable.While both queen regnant Lear and the Inferno c erstwhilentrate on the admonitions and lamentations of human suffering, on that point is cardinal key difference between the works the Inferno has an aspect of fancy that is not present in King Lear. The unavoidable aspect of human suffering is depicted brilliantly by Shakespeare in King Lear. Seemingly insignifi mountaint choices that King Lear makes by dint ofout the campaign end up on the whole changing his life for t he worse. Not only does Lear lose his kingdom, but he excessively loses his family and his home.His situation is only made worse by him not recognizing his fault in his witness actions. Lears lack of responsibility when it comes to his take in problems is best described by Kent It is the stars, the stars supra us govern our conditions (Shakespeare 101). Kent and Lear blame totally of their suffering on the allow of a higher being, neglecting that their own actions brought them to a place where they have to suffer. By not recognizing his responsibility in the events that are happening to him, Lear causes more passage of arms for himself and those around him.He continues to make the same(p) mistakes like falling victim to Regan and Gonerils flattery and ignoring Cordelias wise words. In addition, Lear was constantly advised by the Fool and Kent not to make such poor choices. Lears own stub born(p)ness prevented him from seeing the wisdom in the Fools words. Similarly, in the Inf erno, Capaneus is a man whose penalisement comes as a result of his own defiance. Capaneus was told that his component part would be to almost conquer a city, but fail. Capaneus fought against his fate and defied it, but he ended up in Hell all the same.Capaneus became his own punishment no torment other than your rage itself could punish your gnawing compliment more perfectly (Dante 198). Both Lear and Capaneus show excessive pride and stubbornness throughout their respective works, and fail to see their own faults. They were forewarned about their punishments, yet they continued down the path that would bring them the most suffering. horizontal though suffering is an inevitable part of living and there is no path in life that does not include some manikin of suffering, these two men chose the ones that would bring them the most pain.The Inferno is a storey of cautionary advice. In each circle, Dante the pilgrim speaks to one of the tonuss that reside there and the readers fill how and why the damned have become the damned. As Dante learns from the mistakes of the damned, so do the readers. And as Dante feels the impacts of human suffering, so do the readers. Virgil constantly encourages Dante the pilgrim to learn why the shades are in Hell and what were their transgressions while on Earth. This works purpose is to educate the reader.The works assertions on the nature of human suffering are mostly admonition, with each shade teaching Dante the pilgrim and by extension the reader not to make the same mistakes. Dante views his journey through hell as a learning eff and that is why he made it out alive. King Lear shows an extreme of human suffering. While there is some foreshadowing to the sad end of the conform to and some reproof is given, the fetch mostly focuses on the lamentations of the characters. Edmund laments being born a bastard and the circumstances surrounding his birth.He believes that it is in his nature to be subversive, evil, and man ipulative. Yet, unlike Lear, Edmund does not place the blame of his unfortunate life on the stars I should have been that I am, had the maidenliest star in the firmament twinkled on my bastardizing (Shakespeare 20). Edmund does, however, blame society for his actions, which is just as harmful as Lear blaming the stars. If anything, this play illustrates that as humans we are completely responsible for our actions and that our own suffering is a consequence of poor judgments.Both the Inferno and King Lear depict the offensive aspects of human suffering, but there is one key difference. There is a complete absence of hope in King Lear and it shows in the tragic ending of the play. Not only do most of the characters die, but also none of them hit redemption or are able to achieve forgiveness for their actions (with the exception of Edmund). King Lear makes a discouraging pedagogy about humanity and the extent of human suffering that suffering is a ceaseless aspect of human life an d it derrierenot be overcome We that are novel shall never see so much, nor live so long (Shakespeare 142).This invokement made by Edgar shows the hopelessness of the circumstances Edgar, Albany, and Kent have found themselves in at the end of King Lear. In the Inferno, Dante walks through Hell, literally, and comes out on the other side alive, something that no one else has been able to achieve. Dante the pilgrim and Dante the poet saw the polish off of humanity and have been able to come out of the experience with hope I saw the lovely things the heavens hold, and we came out to see once more the stars (Dante 383).This observation at the end of the Inferno by Dante shows that he still believes that there is good in the world and that human suffering is not all there is to life and death. Dante the poet also maintains the readers hope throughout the work by showing that Dante the pilgrim made it through hell But I remained to tell about without more register (Dante 328). The I nferno makes a powerful statement about humanity and human suffering by adding an aspect of hope to the work even though human suffering is inevitable and unavoidable, there is hope and suffering great deal be overcome.Both the Inferno and King Lear have aspects of desperation, but the final disembodied spirit of the works illustrates their differences. King Lear and the Inferno are both tales of human suffering that explore the depth and width of suffering. However, even though they both state that human suffering is inevitable and unavoidable, there is levity in the Inferno that is completely absent in King Lear. The final means of King Lear is the pervasiveness of human suffering and that ones choices not only cause ones own suffering, but can cause the suffering of others. King Lear ends on a note of eternal sadness.Infernos final message is a much more hopeful one one can be touched by human suffering and one can experience human suffering, but that does not mean that all ho pe is lost. In the Inferno, suffering is just one aspect of the human experience, not the only aspect, and it does not have to define ones life. general these works tell us about the unpleasant, yet necessary, parts of the human experience that will affect everyone at some point in their lives, but it is how we handle human suffering that matters most. Works Cited Dante. Inferno. New York Penguin, 2003. Print. Shakespeare, William. King Lear. New York Penguin, 1999. Print.