The Benefits of Reducing World Population Essay -- Argumentative Persu

The Benefits of reducing World creationScientist Julian Simon asserted in 1992 that universe growth, perceived by umteen to be a growing crisis, was in fact a vast boon to society. Simon countered the common argument that over race would result in miserable, deteriorating living conditions by postulating that population growth, scotch growth, and a resource-rich populace coupled with modern engineering science will produce greater prosperity and better health for change magnitude numbers of people (Southwick, p. 160). Given the fact that more people directly are living in misery and poverty than ever, Simons picturesque land has gone largely unsupported (Southwick, p. 161). Recent intelligence agency that the population shoot is currently on hold then, should come as great discussion to the greater portion of individuals in the solid ground. Rather than 12 to 14 one million million worldly concern inhabitants in the mid-twenty first century, recent figures project a deterioration from roughly nine billion people in 2050. The shrinking of the world population will almost undoubtedly create drastic economic and political changes (Wattenberg, p.1). These predicted changes, though, seem minor in comparison to the poor environmental state that most agreed would be reached if the population boom out continue in the same manner. It seems as though the shrinking of the world population will allow for the existence of fewer billions of people with more luxuriant resources and a better quality environment rather than the existence of 10 to 15 billion people living in poverty and undernourishment (Southwick, p. 161).For the past five years the United Nations has witnessed a trend in fertility rates that will alter the face of the globe. Rather than a fertility rate of 2.1, which was the assumed worl... ...once feared rate.SourcesDolan, Edwin G., Ch. 5 from TANSTAAFL The Economic Strategy for environmental Crisis 1974Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., & Lo, K. (2002). Global Warming Continues. Science, 295, 275.Kerr, R. A. (2002). A Brighter Outlook for Good Ozone. Science, 297, 1623-5.NPR Radio Broadcast, border district 17, 2002. http//discover.npr.org/features/feature.jhtml?wfId=1140067Poliakoff, M., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Farren, T. R., & Anastas, P. T. (2002). Green Chemistry Science and Politics of Change. Science, 297, 807-810.Quay, P. (2002). Ups and Downs of CO2 Uptake. Science, 298, 2344.Southwick, C. H. (1996). Chapter 15 humans nations. Global Ecology in piece Perspective. Oxford University Press, 159-182. Wattenberg, B. J. ( work 8, 2003). It Will Be a Smaller World After All. New York Times Editorial/Op-Ed Section. The Benefits of Reducing World Population Essay -- Argumentative PersuThe Benefits of Reducing World PopulationScientist Julian Simon asserted in 1992 that population growth, perceived by many to be a growing crisis, was in fact a gigantic boon to society. Simon countered the common argum ent that overpopulation would result in miserable, deteriorating living conditions by postulating that population growth, economic growth, and a resource-rich world coupled with modern engine room will produce greater prosperity and better health for increase numbers of people (Southwick, p. 160). Given the fact that more people today are living in misery and poverty than ever, Simons picturesque world has gone largely unsupported (Southwick, p. 161). Recent news that the population boom is currently on hold then, should come as great news to the greater portion of individuals in the world. Rather than 12 to 14 billion world inhabitants in the mid-twenty first century, recent figures project a stock from roughly nine billion people in 2050. The shrinking of the world population will almost undoubtedly create drastic economic and political changes (Wattenberg, p.1). These predicted changes, though, seem minor in comparison to the poor environmental state that most agreed would be r eached if the population boom keep in the same manner. It seems as though the shrinking of the world population will allow for the existence of fewer billions of people with more plenteous resources and a better quality environment rather than the existence of 10 to 15 billion people living in poverty and malnourishment (Southwick, p. 161).For the past five years the United Nations has witnessed a trend in fertility rates that will alter the face of the globe. Rather than a fertility rate of 2.1, which was the assumed worl... ...once feared rate.SourcesDolan, Edwin G., Ch. 5 from TANSTAAFL The Economic Strategy for environmental Crisis 1974Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., & Lo, K. (2002). Global Warming Continues. Science, 295, 275.Kerr, R. A. (2002). A Brighter Outlook for Good Ozone. Science, 297, 1623-5.NPR Radio Broadcast, March 17, 2002. http//discover.npr.org/features/feature.jhtml?wfId=1140067Poliakoff, M., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Farren, T. R., & Anastas, P. T. (2002). Green Chemistry Science and Politics of Change. Science, 297, 807-810.Quay, P. (2002). Ups and Downs of CO2 Uptake. Science, 298, 2344.Southwick, C. H. (1996). Chapter 15 Human Populations. Global Ecology in Human Perspective. Oxford University Press, 159-182. Wattenberg, B. J. (March 8, 2003). It Will Be a Smaller World After All. New York Times Editorial/Op-Ed Section.